The 7th Momentum Biennial

Johan Zetterquist
Johan Zetterquist, Proposal No.29: A Monument Celebrating the End of Capitalism as We Know it, 2013. Photograph: Vegard Kleven. Courtesy the artist and Punkt Ø – Galleri F 15 & Momentum

The Nordic Biennial, aka Momentum, takes place in the town of Moss on the outskirts of Oslo. For the seventh edition, two Scandinavian curators harbouring diverse practices – Power Ekroth and Erland Hammer – decided to ‘agree to disagree’: that is to create two parallel exhibitions. Theorists might refer to this thematic conflict as ‘positive antagonism’, wherein friction stemming from disagreement can fuel change or motivate a redirection of energies. What matters more than deciding to get along, or otherwise, is what results: combined energies, going against the grain or doing or saying nothing. Revolts and rebellions can be useless if the idea behind an action is misinformed; motivations should aim for transparency. Whether or not art can be apolitical is a question for this event. Art is perceived to be as signficant as a transformative political revolution by only a handful of appreciators.

Unlike Momentum 6, which involved five Scandinavian curators, a single theme and more exhibition spaces, the current biennial downplays collaboration. This year, Momentum Kunsthall – a former brewery in the city centre – is the primary exhibition space together with Heilmannparken, a nineteenth-century garden, and the entrance area to Møllebyen and Momentum Kunsthall providing additional space. The curators have divided these spaces, with Ekroth focusing more on the external public areas. No singular conclusion arises from either curator’s work; how one views these radically different exhibitions remains the responsibility of a searching audience.

Still, both curators confront thematic relevance, questioning its necessity. The artists in Ekroth’s share of the biennnial, Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast do not fit into any prepackaged concept; they cajole the viewer to enter other worlds (the title references Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland), some of them delusional yet deserving inspection. In Tower of Babel (2011), Iranian artist Goran Hassanpour shares his sculptural interpretation of Babylon based upon how he privately imagined this utopia to be at an amorphous point in time – when the world was sublime and unfettered. Together, these works invite viewers to reexamine their approaches to the truisms and fallacies of art as tool or saviour. Ekroth suggests in her foreword one political axiom inspired by Marx & Engels:

‘Art is both “base” and “superstructure”… Every-day life [is] where all transactions between people happen within the “base”, where the forces and relations of production such as the division of labour and property exist; the relations into which people enter to produce the necessities of life. Then there is the “superstructure” which can be described as whatever else we need to make the base function: the laws, the economic structure, the ideology and the history of the society – and how one regards oneself within the society is of course part of this.’

Forces at the base (eg. the Internet) affect the superstructure (eg. culture and education), yet art is considered the conjoining thread and ticket to move among these spheres – and citizens, for Ekroth, must re-evaluate how the base relates to the overarching schematics via frank confrontation and analysis of these components. Highlighting forces that manipulate creativity, Ekroth emphasises in her text the importance of artists’ freedom to create and viewers’ freedom to respond accordingly. Attempts to understand and embrace slippery paradoxes affecting the real world and the world of dreams take precedence. In Dutch artist Gabriel Lester’s silent film The Blank Stare (2013), characters gaze into the camera, daydreaming, amidst uninterrupted thoughts and otherworldly inscapes. ‘It is nearly impossible for an artist to create any resistance [to an an art world which views artists as production-machines],’ the curator observes. ‘This leads to the daunting conclusion that the ultimate resistance today would be to simply stop acting or producing.’ Certainly, no curator wishes paralysis on any arts community. Yet, how to avoid being part of the production machine – Ekroth ‘We are now driven by not only our libido or desire (to consume), but also by the new normal’ – remains a conundrum. Pointedly, Swedish artist Johan Zetterquist shares various unrealised suggestions for Momentum, one being Proposal No. 29, A Monument Celebrating the End of Capitalism As We Know It (2013), hinting at a desire to free himself from the system’s shackles.

Erland Hammer’s Dare to Love Yourself, primarily located on both floors of one side of Momentum Kunsthall, is not nearly so sociopolitically engaged or phantasmagorical. Trust yourself and your instincts, his title suggests; steer clear of what others expect. Elsewhere, Hammer quotes the Sufi mystic Rumi, and his focus leans towards the introspective and spiritual. ‘The artists were not invited, nor were any works chosen or developed, based on any kind of relationship to the exhibition as whole,’ he remarks in the catalogue: ‘… I want everything to look good. I curate exhibitions visually. I think about politics when deciding who to vote for, not when installing sculpture.’ Works such as Bjarne Melgaard’s Untitled (2013) and Charlotte Wankel’s Portrett av Ingar Wankel og Elisabeth Wankel (1940), for example, emphasise Hammer’s affinity for abstract painting. He’s uninterested in forcing viewers to engage with hot topics or historicity; if an exhibition is a circus, he refuses to balance on the tightrope.

After seeing both halves, I harbour an image of Ekroth in a psychedelic garage with the artworld’s hood up, grease caked beneath her fingernails, whilst Hammer floats unhindered somewhere in a self-designed, somewhat egocentric realm. Some may argue that one exhibition is ‘better’, more ‘desirable’ than its counterpart; this is reductive. More appealing is how this dichotomy provokes one to consider the vulnerabilities of each show-as-unit and the biennial as a whole. Consider how Ekroth’s tenets of ‘base’ and ‘superstructure’ apply to this event. Positive antagonism often unleashes buried sentiments begging for either utility or release. In short, the curators’ playfulness and defence of individualism is duly noted.
To see the review in context, click here.

Riga International Biennial of Contemporary Art (RIBOCA1)

Aslan Gaisumov
Aslan Gaisumov, People of No Consequence, 2016.

For the first Riga International Biennial of Contemporary Art, curator Katarina Gregos has chosen to view Latvia as ‘the center of the world,’ where other regions and nationalities become satellites. This is refreshing, for the Baltics have previously been considered to have a peripheral status. More »

Johannes Heldén, “The Exploding Book”

Johannes Heldén
Johannes Heldén, Clouds, 2017.

As one enters the space temporarily designated for Swedish artist and poet Johannes Heldén’s The Exploding Book at Konstakademin’s in Stockholm, one detects that Heldén is receptive to nuance; each creative gesture confirms his dedication to both text and image, expressed with equitable consideration. More »

Malin Gabriella Nordin, “Floating from Within”

Malin Gabriella Nordin, Veil of Dreams, 2017. Image: Gallery Steinsland Berliner.

Stockholm-based artist Malin Gabriella Nordin is one of many Swedish women artists who resort to the basics – or perhaps the old ways, meaning they’re not particularly interested in the digital. More »

“Survival Kit 9”

Andris Eglītis, Laboratory of Poetic Research, 2017. Image: Jacquelyn Davis.

The 9th edition of Survival Kit is orchestrated by a small team of Baltic and Scandinavian curators: Jonatan Habib Engqvist, Solvita Krese and Inga Lāce. All possess a background in organizing independently and within the confines of institutions, which may be their strong point—their fluidity. More »

The 9th Momentum Biennial

Jenna Sutela, Sporulating Paragraph, 2017. Image: Momentum 9.

Momentum 9, taking place in the industrial town of Moss, Norway, is being curated by Ulrika Flink, Ilari Laamanen, Jacob Lillemose, Gunhild Moe, and Jón B.K. Ransu, who together represent the Scandinavian region. With this biennial’s focus on ‘alienation’, the curators joined forces to determine how alien processes and entities are infused in our lives through technological, ecological and social transformations. More »

Klas Eriksson, “Vet din mamma var du e?”

Klas Eriksson
Klas Eriksson, Evidence of Patchwork, 2017. Image: Göteborgs Konsthall.

Swedish artist Klas Eriksson has developed a practice rooted in examining subcultures via works in public spaces and spontaneous performances. With an interest in how power flows and how crowds function, the artist attempts to unpack sociopolitical dynamics using playful tactics. More »

Lovisa Ringborg, “Night Remains”

Lovisa Ringborg
Lovisa Ringborg, Fountain, 2017. Image: Cecilia Hillström Gallery.

In Lovisa Ringborg’s second exhibition at this gallery, the artist upholds the argument that displaying a set of harmonious works can be more potent than a plethora of free-floating entities. More »

Przemek Pyszczek, “1989”

Przemek Pyszczek
Przemek Pyszczek, Public Relief No 6, 2016. Image: Gallery Belenius.

Polish-born, Canadian-raised, Berlin-based artist Przemek Pyszczek displays new works which are primarily sculptural and mixed media, with stints into collage. More »

Ulf Rollof, “Kleptomaniac”

Ulf Rollof
Ulf Rollof, Hungry Stranded, 2016. Image: CFHILL.

Sequestered above the restaurant Nosh & Chow in Stockholm (designed by Barcelona-based Lázaro Rosa-Violán), renowned Swedish artist Ulf Rollof’s current solo exhibition is the last installment in a trilogy that began in Mexico City. More »